A photo painted on a canvass is certainly an offspring reborn from the authentic images of nature ingenuously captured for the appreciation of the immeasurable beauty of art, and a painting taken from a photo is unmistakably a masterpiece created for the acceptance of digital outlines as valuable parcels of the grand design of the creative sphere of life.

Wittingly, it is in juxtaposition with an eminent paradox of life that a painter can paint the images of others’ lives, but is unable to draw the straight lines of his own life. It may be an inherent irony which has subsequently changed the views of every craftsmen in the world of art. Nonetheless, many are still unaware of such; thus, the consequence has made a “psychopathic” society where almost everybody does not know that the development of man’s mind in science has never deformed the shape of the globe; it had only made a way for the enhancement of the distorted human skills and ability.

The rise of digital technology, for instance, has now become an instrument for the refinement of of all the elements of an image such as the color and the background among others. It is not true, however, that the existence of digital printing has replaced the classic importance of manual painting. Contrariwise, the traditional and modern forms of art are interdependent with each other, and thus the images produced by the technology have never been materialized without the processes of painting from the past as prime basis for such.

Indeed, it is a common objective of an artwork, whether manually or digitally created, to bring an “immortal” life to every surface of the canvass that only the time can limit. There is, apparently, no standard basis for the appreciation of any image because the perception of every man about reality and illusion so does differ. Hence, the only definite assumption one can formulate in seeing and judging a certain creation is that the artist wants to convey a concrete idea out of an abstract representation of thought.

At any rate, it makes no difference in layman’s point of view in which the main object of judgment is not the appreciation of what is good, but the criticism of what is bad. This is a critical fact which has already become an anathema in the minds of the neophyte manual and digital painters. As a consequence thereof, the fear of failure has also been inculcated on their consciousness, thus, affecting every stroke they made for the creation of the whole “picture” of a masterpiece.

Certainly, it is one crucial phenomenon that could either create a new perspective about the real essence of havingpictures into paintings or make a new heretic dogma about the role of painters. Hence, the current views about the world of art call for the restoration of the olden maxims about the first creation made in the land of men. In such case, there was no prosecution, only the appreciation and protection of the beauty of life.

Nevertheless, in the grand scheme of things, it is still the dogmatic view about life as the greatest work of art ever made that would rule over human hypocrisy. Hence, if only then that every man knows how to fairly appreciate every aspect of the divine creations in this material world, there would certainly be no skeptic thoughts about the root of existence of life.

Anyhow and after all, what matters in the world of art is the life of images and images of life formed in an extraordinary painting produced not by money, but by one’s skill.

Contact us! We have the masterpiece that you have been searching for…

pictures into paintings

A photo painted on a canvass is certainly an offspring reborn from the authentic images of nature ingenuously captured for the appreciation of the immeasurable beauty of art, and a painting taken from a photo is unmistakably a masterpiece created for the acceptance of digital outlines as valuable parcels of the grand design of the creative sphere of life.

Wittingly, it is in juxtaposition with an eminent paradox of life that a painter can paint the images of others’ lives, but is unable to draw the straight lines of his own life. It may be an inherent irony which has subsequently changed the views of every craftsmen in the world of art. Nonetheless, many are still unaware of such; thus, the consequence has made a “psychopathic” society where almost everybody does not know that the development of man’s mind in science has never deformed the shape of the globe; it had only made a way for the enhancement of the distorted human skills and ability.

The rise of digital technology, for instance, has now become an instrument for the refinement of of all the elements of an image such as the color and the background among others. It is not true, however, that the existence of digital printing has replaced the classic importance of manual painting. Contrariwise, the traditional and modern forms of art are interdependent with each other, and thus the images produced by the technology have never been materialized without the processes of painting from the past as prime basis for such.

Indeed, it is a common objective of an artwork, whether manually or digitally created, to bring an “immortal” life to every surface of the canvass that only the time can limit. There is, apparently, no standard basis for the appreciation of any image because the perception of every man about reality and illusion so does differ. Hence, the only definite assumption one can formulate in seeing and judging a certain creation is that the artist wants to convey a concrete idea out of an abstract representation of thought.

At any rate, it makes no difference in layman’s point of view in which the main object of judgment is not the appreciation of what is good, but the criticism of what is bad. This is a critical fact which has already become an anathema in the minds of the neophyte manual and digital painters. As a consequence thereof, the fear of failure has also been inculcated on their consciousness, thus, affecting every stroke they made for the creation of the whole “picture” of a masterpiece.

Certainly, it is one crucial phenomenon that could either create a new perspective about the real essence of having pictures into paintings or make a new heretic dogma about the role of painters. Hence, the current views about the world of art call for the restoration of the olden maxims about the first creation made in the land of men. In such case, there was no prosecution, only the appreciation and protection of the beauty of life.

Nevertheless, in the grand scheme of things, it is still the dogmatic view about life as the greatest work of art ever made that would rule over human hypocrisy. Hence, if only then that every man knows how to fairly appreciate every aspect of the divine creations in this material world, there would certainly be no skeptic thoughts about the root of existence of life.

Anyhow and after all, what matters in the world of art is the life of images and images of life formed in an extraordinary painting produced not by money, but by one’s skill.

Contact us! We have the masterpiece that you have been searching for…